Decisions

• Decision CONDE CONDE, 21 April 2008. (in English)

The witnesses who had testified in court were considered as partial because they had previously testified before the prosecutor (art. 14.1 PIDCP). Inadmissible for abuse in the procedure.

• Decision FERNÁNDEZ MURCIA, 23 April 2008. (in English)

The fact that the High Court declared the appeal inadmissible undermines the right to equal treatment before the court (art. 14.1 of the PIDCP), is discriminatory and arbitrary (art. 26 of the PIDCP). Inadmissible for manifest lack of sufficient grounds.

• Decision MANZÓN COSTA, 23 April 2008. (in English)

Violation of article 25 of the PIDCP because he cannot vote or be chosen King of Spain. Inadmissible ratione materiae.   

• Decision SUBEIRO BESTI, 23 April 2008. (in English)

The condemnatory decision and the sentence imposed were not reviewed by a higher court, as requested by article 14.5 of the PIDCP. Inadmissible for not having sufficient grounds.

• Decision PINDADO MARTÍNEZ, 12 November 2008 (in English)

Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, right to be judged by an impartial tribunal and right to have the decision and the sentence submitted to a higher court after a criminal charge for a crime against public health (art. 14 of the PIDCP). Inadmissible for not having sufficient grounds.

• Decision RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZ, 12 November 2008 (in English)

Reach of the review in appeal by the Spanish courts in a criminal affair (art. 14.5 of the PIDCP). Inadmissible for lack of sufficient grounds.